Guo XX, Deng JZ, Cheng LQ, Lin YB, Cao T, Feng JL, Gao YN, Yang XS, Liang SS. Postoperative circulating tumor DNA detection predicts recurrence and guides adjuvant chemotherapy duration in high-risk stage III colorectal cancer. World J Gastrointest Surg 2026; 18(9): 120399 [DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.120399]
Evaluation of a Journal’s Credibility by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a journal’s credibility is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the manuscript editing and publishing process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the online submission system?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the peer review report?
Yes
3 Are you satisfied with the editing quality of the article?
Yes
4 Are you satisfied with the article PDFs?
Yes
5 Are you satisfied with the online full-text article?
Yes
6 Are you satisfied with the prepared figures in the online full-text article?
Yes
7 Are you satisfied with the prepared tables in the online full-text article?
Yes
8 Are you satisfied with the published articles processes?
Yes
9 Are you satisfied with the requirement for providing academic rules and norms?
Yes
10 Are you satisfied with the academic misconduct detection report?
Yes
11 Are you satisfied with the period of publication?
Yes
12 Are you satisfied with the editing and publishing rules and norms?
Yes
Evaluation of a Journal’s Peer Review by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a given journal’s peer review is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the peer review process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the time spent for peer review?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the anonymous peer review process?
Yes
3 Is the peer review report of great help to your manuscript?
Yes
4 Do you think the peer review report for your manuscript is fair or objective?
Yes
Author‘s Comments
Our experience with this journal exceeded expectations in every respect. From the moment of submission, the editorial office demonstrated remarkable efficiency and genuine interest in our work. The reviewers' expertise in gastrointestinal oncology was evident through their precise, actionable feedback, which elevated the scientific quality of our manuscript. Communication remained prompt and courteous throughout the revision stages. Seeing our article published and subsequently cited by peers in the field has been deeply gratifying. This journal is a dependable and respected venue for oncology researchers worldwide.